3.
Unfortunately, for the petitioner, retirement from government
service did not bring an end to his ordeals and it was the
proverbial “out of the frying pan into the fire”.
a.
The petitioner's only source of income since retirement from
government service is his meageri
monthly pension and in order to maintain a minimum standard of living
the petitioner perforce has to supplement it by taking up a job.
i)
In his case, under normal circumstances this should not have been a
problem, especially so with the mushrooming of private medical
colleges in Kerala in the recent past and the resulting huge demand
for teachers in medical physiology.
ii)
However he is being forced to spend his life after retirement in
dire poverty, in the seclusion of his shack, doing the work usually
allotted to a housemaid and has to eke out a miserable existence on
his meager monthly pension.
b.
Being homeless, the petitioner, ever since his release from the
army in 1992, has been living in rented houses. In 1995 on joining
the staff of medical college Thiruvananthapuram the petitioner
shifted to Thiruvananthapuram and from then on has been living in and
around Trivandrum city, except for a one year stay in dt. during 2010
- 11 in a futile attempt to build a house of his own there.
i)
AT PRESENT THE PETITIONER, OUT OF EXTREME COMPULSIONS, IS LIVING IN A
SHACKii
building No. V/168 of Karakulam panchayath, a 4 x 5 sq. meter single
storey structure with four inch thick brick walls and asbestos/GI
sheet roofing, in Thiruvananthapuram district of Kerala state.
ii)
The shack where he is living now stands on a 4 Are (9.5 cents) plot
of land purchased by the petitioner in 2011 out of his life time
savings with the intention of constructing a house of his own and
making it his permanent abode. In deed, the construction work started
in right earnest in august 2011 for of a small single storey 80 sq.
meter house using the low cost building techniques of the famous Dr.
laury baker at a total estimated cost of 9 lakhs just adjacent to
the shack. However,
iii)
in june 2012 things came to a grinding halt, with the builders
engaged by the petitioner refusing to proceed further after
constructing the basement part. Interestingly there was no reason
given for this sudden change of mind; they builders were simply “no
more interested”.
iv)
Due to the unique construction methodology adopted by the builders
if the petitioner goes to a normal builder he will have to start from
scratch and this will result in tremendous loss to the petitioner. A
complaint No. cc 349 of 2012 in the district consumer disputes
redressal forum of thiruvananthpuram is dragging on for more than a
year now with the opposite party using delaying tactics.
v)
The petitioner who had moved into the shack in june 2011 in the hope
that it is going to be for a few months till the house proper is
constructed finds himself literally trapped.
c.
Even in the present humble abode of his own in a remote area of
rocks and rubber trees he is being made to lead a dog's life.
i)
The petitioner has strong reason to believe that his shackiii
is being broken into and ransacked while he is away. His personal
property is being stolen and destroyed wantonlyiv.
At
one stage his domestic cooking gas cylinders were being targeted and
serious accidents were avoided because of the diligencev
exercised by the petitioner.
ii)
Almost all electronic gadgets in his possession from his fax machine
and telephone answering machine to his television set has been made
non-functional. the only dependable connection he has with the
outside world is his transistor radio.
iii) The petitioner's computer systems have been completely
compromised; with the result that whatever the petitioner does on his
computer is in the public domain. He has no personal secrets. none of
the accessories on the system function.
iv)
Because of the tampering carried out on his personal computer his
functional ability has been reduced to a small fraction of his
potential. Work that normally requires an hour takes days to finish
and even then files might disappear altogether. the petitioner has to
perforce peruse the hard copy to ensure that it contains the same
matter as he had put in.
d.
For all practical purposes the petitioner is being kept
incommunicado.
i)
Postal articles of any moment addressed to him do not reach
him except when the delivery is to be recorded.
ii)
His home telephone from the thiruvananthapuram telecom of bsnl
is not only being tapped but is also being actively tampered with.
iii)
The adsl internet connection supposed to be available on his land
line phone has been reduced to naught . the connection is being
inactivated at will.
iv)
The online services available to almost every Indian citizen
now a days is not accessible to the petitioner.
v)
He has been prevented more than once from electronically
accessing his own money from his bank account on false pretexts.
vi)
The tempering whether it is with the communication services of
Thiruvananthapuram telecom or the online services of the state bank
of India is taking place from within the server of the service
provider and can be made to recur at any critical moments of the
deepest consequence to the petitioner.
f.
Even petty mundane existence has become an ordeal.
i)
None of the local shop keepers ever turned the petitioner out but
many of them have made it obvious at one occasion or other that he
was not welcome.
iii)
Social and cultural life of any sort has been made impossible and,
ostracised and isolated, the petitioner is living the life of a
pariah.
It
is all because of the petioner's PECULIARvi
CIRCUMSTANCES vii
4.
a. An
ex-service officer and a service pensioner of the Kerala Government,
the petitioner has no criminal record whatsoever and never had any
brushes with the law of the land. All the same, the petitioner has
been, and still is, at the receiving end of the nefariousviii
designsix
of a gang of plain clothes men from the spy net works of the
government of this country.
i)
The petitioner avers that every stumbling block in the path of his
leading a normal, quietx,
healthy and fruitful life, is the result of the covert criminal
activities of the agents of these government let loose on him.
ii)
His life and liberties are being trampled upon with impunity by the
stalking spies. For all practical purposes he is being kept
incommunicado.
He
is not aware of any procedure established by law being invoked in
depriving him of his fundamental rights.
The
petitioner begs to submit that whatever the excuse the spies may
have put up for their activities directed at the petitioner, the
only real reason is sheer malice and disrespect for the rule of law
and basic human rights.
b.
Every effort on the part of the petitioner to bring the spies out
into the open and settle the matter for good one way or the other is
being nipped in the bud thanks to the tremendous clout of the spies
have over the decision making authorities; and that includes the
petitioners various efforts to move the Kerala high court on the
matter.
i)
The spies are acutely aware of the fact that they do not have any
purchase on the petitioner and therefore have always been in hiding,
ensure that they never come into direct confrontation with the
petitioner and restrict themselves to covert operations.
ii)
The overt criminal activities of the spies directed at the petitioner
are carried out by proxy through their hired thugs from amongst the
locals.
iii)
That makes it all the more difficult for the petitioner to tackle the
real culprits.
c.
Some time in 2009, in an attempt to expose the culprits, the
petitioner made requests for information under the Right To
Information ( RTI ) Act 2005 to many govt. agencies and departments.
True copies of the correspondence in this regard available with the
petitioner in the case of the Intelligence Bureau (IB), Special
Branch CID of Kerala Police (SB CID) and the CBI along with the
petitioner's notes is produced herewith and marked ANNEXURE P0
i)
The CBI has denied any involvement.
The
snag here is that it is the Anti corruption Branch (ACB) of the
bureau that has denied involvement. And the ACB is most unlikely to
be the part of the bureau that will deal with the matters that the
petitioner has raised.
ii)
The “special branch” CID of the Kerala Police has refused to
comply.
Initially
the request was returned undelivered; the petitioner feels this is a
standard tactic regularly used by the members of this organization to
avoid embarrassing letters; could be with the collusion of India
post.
The
petitioner tried again and this time the letter containing the
request was received by the SB CID HQ at Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram.
The information was refused again and the request returned to the
applicant without following the norms to be adopted in case as per
the RTI Act 2005. The basic idea, the petitioner feels, was to make
the petitioner run round in circles.
In
the above context the petitioner would beg to bring to the kind
notice of this Hon'ble court that it was the “special branch” of
the Kerala police in Ernakulam that, in an effort to dupe the
judiciary, whiskedxi
away the petitioner's brief case containing the case files from the
Ernakulam railway station on march 3, 2004, just few minutes before
he was to present a case in the Hon'ble Kerala high court. Object
achieved the SB CID for once returned the brief case to him after the
hearing.
The
petitioner is convinced that the SB CID of the Kerala Police has a
skeleton in their cupboard.
The
IB has refused to provide the information in spite of an appeal
claiming immunity which is redundant as far as the information
requested for by the petitioner is concerned. His appeal has also
been rejected.
iv)
This petitioner's humble conclusion is that the IB and the Special
Branch CID of the Kerala police, have implicated themselves by Acts
of Omission, while the CBI is trying to get away with what is most
likely a half-truth.
iv)
It is simply not possible for an ordinary mortal like the petitioner
to live normally when he has a battalion of unscrupulous plains
clothes men stalking him 24 x 7.
5. THE
CRUX OF THE MATTER as the petitioner understands it is that to the
vested interests in certain govt. agencies and institutions, the
petitioner is an “untouchable” and these powersxii
that be who for all practical purposes is running a parallel system
of government have unanimously decided that this “untouchable”
of the twenty first century India should not be allowed to survive.
i)
"Untouchabiliy", according to the white man whom this self
styled “intelligentsia” in Thiruvananthapuram apes, cannot be a
reason for denying some one his life and liberties and as such
"insanity" is being used as a facade to achieve the desired
end.
ii)
Murder is messy; so what is being planned is a “therapeutic
murder”. The basic strategy is to medicalise the petitioner and put
him within the remitsxiii
of unscrupulousxiv
mental health professionals who will brand him a vegetable and leave
him to rot.
iii)
With the above end in mind the concerned members of the spy net
works recruited the vested interests from among the doctors of
Medical College, Trivandrum, who scripted the story of the
petitioner's insanity with the “dementia hypothesis” as the
main pillar on which the facade of the petitioner's insanity was
propped up.
iv)
It is as part of the executive arm of the plan to neutralise the
petitioner by hook or by crook, that a battalion of plainclothes men
from the spy net works of the government along with other
paraphernalia has been let loose on the petitioner, no holds barred.
6.
The atrocities perpetrated on the petitioner by these agents of
the government are a disgrace to even the most primitive of
societies and amount to torture as defined by The united nations
Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment. The petitioner has been putting up with the
torture for decades now.
a.
The ghastliest of the criminal acts of these agents of the
government was carried out on a dark February night in 2003 in an
effort to fool the laymen and the gullible members of the decision
making bodies into believing that the petitioner's fate is sealed.
i)
The petitioner has strong reason to believe that his house was broken
in to, he was put out and a highly invasive and potentially very
dangerous and even lethal, diagnostic procedure was carried out on
him in a heinous effort to cook up evidence which the omniscient
spies and their collaborators from the medical doctors of
Thiruvananthapuram medical college will clinch the issue of the
petitioner's dementia.
During
the period 2003 - 2006 the petitioner was putting up in a rented
house in Kattela in Srikaryam in the outskirts of Thiruvananthapuram
city. This was in an effort to shake off the spies and get some peace
and do some reading for the petitioner still believed that there was
light at the end of the tunnel and was aspiring to get his MD degree.
Normally once the petitioner falls asleep in the night, the next
thing he knows is that it is morning hours. However,
One
night in February 2003 the petitioner who was asleep in his bed room
in his rented house where he was staying all alone as usual, woke up
at about 0300 hrs in the early morning and found that his bed sheet
was soaked in blood.
A
picture of the blood soaked bed sheet along with a picture of the
mattress underneath which had soaked up the blood is produced
herewith and marked EXHIBIT P0 .
The
blood was in the region of the bed where the waist would be. The
first thing that occurred to the petitioner was that it could be from
the urethra and he went to the toilet and tried passing urine. To his
relief he found that the urine was clear. Obviously the blood had not
originated from the urethra or, for that matter, from the anus. There
were no visible wounds, neither fresh wounds nor old ones which could
have gaped, or other injuries, as far as he could see on the visible
part of the petitioner's body.
The
petitioner does not suffer from any bleeding diathesis and never had
an episode of such severe bleeding from his body before that black
night in February 2003 and it never recurred.
After
this incident the petitioner used to not only ensure that he bolt his
bed room door but lock it up as well from the inside where possible
before going to sleep. The petitioner has strong reason to believe
that his house was broken in and a highly invasive and potentially
very dangerous and even lethal, diagnostic procedure was carried out
on him after putting him out.
The
procedure carried out on that night in February 2003 on the
petitioner could not have been performed by any one other than a
medical doctor and taking into account the circumstances of this
particular case, the most likely scenario is that at least one
medical doctor trained in anaesthesia was involved in this crime
which is against all ethical norms of the medical profession and a
serious offence under the various sections of the Indian penal code.
The
petitioner has no idea whether there are specialist “doctors”,
like the ones who administer "truth serum" or perform the
so called “brain mapping” on their victims in this country and
those who help in giving the lethal injections in certain "civilized"
countries, appointed to the spy net works of the governments in this
country to perform this sort of "operations".
The
practice as the petitioner knew of it in the olden times is that
after drilling a six centimeter deep hole in one's back, cotton
dipped in tincture benzoin is used to seal the hole to prevent
infection and stop bleeding. But then there was a possibility of the
petitioner coming to know of what had happened. The philanthropic
physicians of Medical College, Trivandrum and the spies probably did
not want to take this risk .
It
was very much possible that the petitioner could have bled to death
or could have developed other fatal complications but this could
easily be taken care of by producing a "relative" and
paying her off. The spy's only problem is the person of the
petitioner.
There
is no way the petitioner can identify the spies. The petitioner till
today has the bed sheet preserved as it is, without washing for the
last six years, in the hope of bringing the culprits to book - it
could contain tell-tale DNA evidence; but under his present
circumstance there is no way he could get the necessary
investigations carried out.
ii)
The petitioner's hunch is that the bleeding episode was the result of
a typical spy model “security” operation, carried out in a
desperate attempt to substantiate the “dementia hypothesis”, in
an effort to clinch the insanity plea and neutralize the petitioner.
iii)
The petitioner is not aware of any provision as per the rules in
vogue in this country for ordering a break in and performing a
procedure on a person without his knowledge or permission in order to
facilitate a policeman's collecting evidence, or as a part of
treatment by a medical doctor for that matter, even if the victim
happens to be a raving lunatic. There are set procedures in such
cases. Even the stipulations of the mental health act with its
obsession with compulsory admissions and institutional care has not
been followed in this case.
iii)
The callousness of the actions and the nonchalance with which the
atrocities are being perpetrated makes the petitioner wonder
whether it is the Indian version of the nazi gestapo, that is in
action against him.
b.
This petitioner has strong reason to believe that the powers that
be of the medical college Thiruvananthapuram in general and the dept
of physiology in particular who were hand in glove with the spies in
their various nefarious activities were actively involved in this
particular atrocity as well.
This
petitioner firmly believes that Prof. (Dr.) Mrs. K. V. Menon , the
then head of the department of physiology of medical college
Trivandrum, was actively involved in the above heinous crime.
i)
As one of the most enthusiastic supporters of the “dementia
hypothesis” and their originators Prof. (Dr.) Mrs. K. V. Menon,
never minded going out of her way to cook up evidence.
ii)
This petitiioner believes that the whole operation resulting in the
bleeding episode was set in motion by the spies and the
intelligentsia of Thiruvananthapuram medical college to extricate
Prof. (Dr.) Mrs. K. V. Menon from the mess she had landed up in.
iii)
During the period immediately following on the bleeding incident, the
then Head of the Department of Physiology of Medical College,
Trivandrum, Prof. Dr. (Mrs.) K. Vijayalekshmi Menon, who initially
had complained to the principal about the petitioner refusing to
“engage” classes, had stopped allotting classes to him.
This,
the petitioner feels was a sequelxv
to the happenings in his bed room on that night in February 2003.
Prof.
Dr. (Mrs.) K. V. Menon, M.D., obviously was aware of the happenings
and was under the impression that the petitioner has been written
off.
iii)
Later another professor of the same department had made an effort to
help the petitioner with his MD thesis work. She was stopped in her
tracks by Prof. Dr. (Mrs.) K. V. Menon probably after sharing the
information gathered by the "security" operation on that
night in February 2003.
c.
All that the petitioner has to submit to the Hon'ble court in the
above context is that, whatever results the spies and their stooges
from Medical College, Trivandrum have produced in consequence of the
bleeding episode of February 2003 cannot substantiate the
“dementia hypothesis” in any way whatsoever. It could prove a
physical illness; not a mental illness.
d.
However the spy net work and their stooges from the
“intelligentsia” in Thiruvananthapuram are under an illusion that
by the dastardly crime described in Para 19 above and the out come
there of, they have clinched the issue of the petitioners dementia
and insanity and in retrospect justified all the criminal activities
carried out by them in the past and they have got the license to do
whatever they please with the petitioner.
The
result is that the petitioner is being treated as a vegetable.
iv)
One of the “bureaus” involved had decided the case
extra-judicially and passed the sentence and withdrawn from the
scene after handing over the petitioner to their colleagues from the
other bureau and the Branch for execution; they can do whatever they
please with the petitioner.
The
result is that the petitioner is being treated as a vegetable.
v)
The public are also welcome and can have their own share in the fun:
Some time in 2003, that was some time after the bleeding incident,
the petitioner had a bunch of plainclothes men at his heels on the
road in front of the university college Thiruvananthapuram, calling
out “bhranthananne”
(malayalam meaning “he is a mad man”).
The
petitioner walked on, for any retaliation would most likely have
ended him up in the nearest lunatic asylum - the mad man has become
violent !
