jyo2013wa_partTwo

3. Unfortunately, for the petitioner, retirement from government service did not bring an end to his ordeals and it was the proverbial “out of the frying pan into the fire”.

a. The petitioner's only source of income since retirement from government service is his meagerⁱ monthly pension and in order to maintain a minimum standard of living the petitioner perforce has to supplement it by taking up a job.

i) In his case, under normal circumstances this should not have been a problem, especially so with the mushrooming of private medical colleges in Kerala in the recent past and the resulting huge demand for teachers in medical physiology.

ii) However he is being forced to spend his life after retirement in dire poverty, in the seclusion of his shack, doing the work usually allotted to a housemaid and has to eke out a miserable existence on his meager monthly pension.

b. Being homeless, the petitioner, ever since his release from the army in 1992, has been living in rented houses. In 1995 on joining the staff of medical college Thiruvananthapuram the petitioner shifted to Thiruvananthapuram and from then on has been living in and around Trivandrum city, except for a one year stay in dt. during 2010 - 11 in a futile attempt to build a house of his own there.

i) AT PRESENT THE PETITIONER, OUT OF EXTREME COMPULSIONS, IS LIVING IN A SHACKⁱⁱ building No. V/168 of Karakulam panchayath, a 4 x 5 sq. meter single storey structure with four inch thick brick walls and asbestos/GI sheet roofing, in Thiruvananthapuram district of Kerala state.

ii) The shack where he is living now stands on a 4 Are (9.5 cents) plot of land purchased by the petitioner in 2011 out of his life time savings with the intention of constructing a house of his own and making it his permanent abode. In deed, the construction work started in right earnest in august 2011 for of a small single storey 80 sq. meter house using the low cost building techniques of the famous Dr. laury baker at a total estimated cost of 9 lakhs just adjacent to the shack. However,

iii) in june 2012 things came to a grinding halt, with the builders engaged by the petitioner refusing to proceed further after constructing the basement part. Interestingly there was no reason given for this sudden change of mind; they builders were simply “no more interested”.

iv) Due to the unique construction methodology adopted by the builders if the petitioner goes to a normal builder he will have to start from scratch and this will result in tremendous loss to the petitioner. A complaint No. cc 349 of 2012 in the district consumer disputes redressal forum of thiruvananthpuram is dragging on for more than a year now with the opposite party using delaying tactics.

v) The petitioner who had moved into the shack in june 2011 in the hope that it is going to be for a few months till the house proper is constructed finds himself literally trapped.

c. Even in the present humble abode of his own in a remote area of rocks and rubber trees he is being made to lead a dog's life.

i) The petitioner has strong reason to believe that his shackⁱⁱⁱ is being broken into and ransacked while he is away. His personal property is being stolen and destroyed wantonly^iv.

At one stage his domestic cooking gas cylinders were being targeted and serious accidents were avoided because of the diligence^v exercised by the petitioner.

ii) Almost all electronic gadgets in his possession from his fax machine and telephone answering machine to his television set has been made non-functional. the only dependable connection he has with the outside world is his transistor radio.

iii) The petitioner's computer systems have been completely compromised; with the result that whatever the petitioner does on his computer is in the public domain. He has no personal secrets. none of the accessories on the system function.

iv) Because of the tampering carried out on his personal computer his functional ability has been reduced to a small fraction of his potential. Work that normally requires an hour takes days to finish and even then files might disappear altogether. the petitioner has to perforce peruse the hard copy to ensure that it contains the same matter as he had put in.

d. For all practical purposes the petitioner is being kept incommunicado.

i) Postal articles of any moment addressed to him do not reach him except when the delivery is to be recorded.

ii) His home telephone from the thiruvananthapuram telecom of bsnl is not only being tapped but is also being actively tampered with.

iii) The adsl internet connection supposed to be available on his land line phone has been reduced to naught . the connection is being inactivated at will.

iv) The online services available to almost every Indian citizen now a days is not accessible to the petitioner.

v) He has been prevented more than once from electronically accessing his own money from his bank account on false pretexts.

vi) The tempering whether it is with the communication services of Thiruvananthapuram telecom or the online services of the state bank of India is taking place from within the server of the service provider and can be made to recur at any critical moments of the deepest consequence to the petitioner.

f. Even petty mundane existence has become an ordeal.

i) None of the local shop keepers ever turned the petitioner out but many of them have made it obvious at one occasion or other that he was not welcome.

iii) Social and cultural life of any sort has been made impossible and, ostracised and isolated, the petitioner is living the life of a pariah.

It is all because of the petioner's PECULIAR^vi CIRCUMSTANCES ^vii

4.

a. An ex-service officer and a service pensioner of the Kerala Government, the petitioner has no criminal record whatsoever and never had any brushes with the law of the land. All the same, the petitioner has been, and still is, at the receiving end of the nefarious^viii designs^ix of a gang of plain clothes men from the spy net works of the government of this country.

i) The petitioner avers that every stumbling block in the path of his leading a normal, quiet^x, healthy and fruitful life, is the result of the covert criminal activities of the agents of these government let loose on him.

ii) His life and liberties are being trampled upon with impunity by the stalking spies. For all practical purposes he is being kept incommunicado.

3. He is not aware of any procedure established by law being invoked in depriving him of his fundamental rights.
4. The petitioner begs to submit that whatever the excuse the spies may have put up for their activities directed at the petitioner, the only real reason is sheer malice and disrespect for the rule of law and basic human rights.

b. Every effort on the part of the petitioner to bring the spies out into the open and settle the matter for good one way or the other is being nipped in the bud thanks to the tremendous clout of the spies have over the decision making authorities; and that includes the petitioners various efforts to move the Kerala high court on the matter.

i) The spies are acutely aware of the fact that they do not have any purchase on the petitioner and therefore have always been in hiding, ensure that they never come into direct confrontation with the petitioner and restrict themselves to covert operations.

ii) The overt criminal activities of the spies directed at the petitioner are carried out by proxy through their hired thugs from amongst the locals.

iii) That makes it all the more difficult for the petitioner to tackle the real culprits.

c. Some time in 2009, in an attempt to expose the culprits, the petitioner made requests for information under the Right To Information ( RTI ) Act 2005 to many govt. agencies and departments. True copies of the correspondence in this regard available with the petitioner in the case of the Intelligence Bureau (IB), Special Branch CID of Kerala Police (SB CID) and the CBI along with the petitioner's notes is produced herewith and marked ANNEXURE P0

i) The CBI has denied any involvement.

The snag here is that it is the Anti corruption Branch (ACB) of the bureau that has denied involvement. And the ACB is most unlikely to be the part of the bureau that will deal with the matters that the petitioner has raised.

ii) The “special branch” CID of the Kerala Police has refused to comply.

Initially the request was returned undelivered; the petitioner feels this is a standard tactic regularly used by the members of this organization to avoid embarrassing letters; could be with the collusion of India post.

The petitioner tried again and this time the letter containing the request was received by the SB CID HQ at Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram. The information was refused again and the request returned to the applicant without following the norms to be adopted in case as per the RTI Act 2005. The basic idea, the petitioner feels, was to make the petitioner run round in circles.

In the above context the petitioner would beg to bring to the kind notice of this Hon'ble court that it was the “special branch” of the Kerala police in Ernakulam that, in an effort to dupe the judiciary, whisked^xi away the petitioner's brief case containing the case files from the Ernakulam railway station on march 3, 2004, just few minutes before he was to present a case in the Hon'ble Kerala high court. Object achieved the SB CID for once returned the brief case to him after the hearing.

The petitioner is convinced that the SB CID of the Kerala Police has a skeleton in their cupboard.

3. The IB has refused to provide the information in spite of an appeal claiming immunity which is redundant as far as the information requested for by the petitioner is concerned. His appeal has also been rejected.

iv) This petitioner's humble conclusion is that the IB and the Special Branch CID of the Kerala police, have implicated themselves by Acts of Omission, while the CBI is trying to get away with what is most likely a half-truth.

iv) It is simply not possible for an ordinary mortal like the petitioner to live normally when he has a battalion of unscrupulous plains clothes men stalking him 24 x 7.

5. THE CRUX OF THE MATTER as the petitioner understands it is that to the vested interests in certain govt. agencies and institutions, the petitioner is an “untouchable” and these powers^xii that be who for all practical purposes is running a parallel system of government have unanimously decided that this “untouchable” of the twenty first century India should not be allowed to survive.

i) "Untouchabiliy", according to the white man whom this self styled “intelligentsia” in Thiruvananthapuram apes, cannot be a reason for denying some one his life and liberties and as such "insanity" is being used as a facade to achieve the desired end.

ii) Murder is messy; so what is being planned is a “therapeutic murder”. The basic strategy is to medicalise the petitioner and put him within the remits^xiii of unscrupulous^xiv mental health professionals who will brand him a vegetable and leave him to rot.

iii) With the above end in mind the concerned members of the spy net works recruited the vested interests from among the doctors of Medical College, Trivandrum, who scripted the story of the petitioner's insanity with the “dementia hypothesis” as the main pillar on which the facade of the petitioner's insanity was propped up.

iv) It is as part of the executive arm of the plan to neutralise the petitioner by hook or by crook, that a battalion of plainclothes men from the spy net works of the government along with other paraphernalia has been let loose on the petitioner, no holds barred.

6. The atrocities perpetrated on the petitioner by these agents of the government are a disgrace to even the most primitive of societies and amount to torture as defined by The united nations Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The petitioner has been putting up with the torture for decades now.

a. The ghastliest of the criminal acts of these agents of the government was carried out on a dark February night in 2003 in an effort to fool the laymen and the gullible members of the decision making bodies into believing that the petitioner's fate is sealed.

i) The petitioner has strong reason to believe that his house was broken in to, he was put out and a highly invasive and potentially very dangerous and even lethal, diagnostic procedure was carried out on him in a heinous effort to cook up evidence which the omniscient spies and their collaborators from the medical doctors of Thiruvananthapuram medical college will clinch the issue of the petitioner's dementia.

During the period 2003 - 2006 the petitioner was putting up in a rented house in Kattela in Srikaryam in the outskirts of Thiruvananthapuram city. This was in an effort to shake off the spies and get some peace and do some reading for the petitioner still believed that there was light at the end of the tunnel and was aspiring to get his MD degree. Normally once the petitioner falls asleep in the night, the next thing he knows is that it is morning hours. However,

One night in February 2003 the petitioner who was asleep in his bed room in his rented house where he was staying all alone as usual, woke up at about 0300 hrs in the early morning and found that his bed sheet was soaked in blood.

A picture of the blood soaked bed sheet along with a picture of the mattress underneath which had soaked up the blood is produced herewith and marked EXHIBIT P0 .

The blood was in the region of the bed where the waist would be. The first thing that occurred to the petitioner was that it could be from the urethra and he went to the toilet and tried passing urine. To his relief he found that the urine was clear. Obviously the blood had not originated from the urethra or, for that matter, from the anus. There were no visible wounds, neither fresh wounds nor old ones which could have gaped, or other injuries, as far as he could see on the visible part of the petitioner's body.

The petitioner does not suffer from any bleeding diathesis and never had an episode of such severe bleeding from his body before that black night in February 2003 and it never recurred.

After this incident the petitioner used to not only ensure that he bolt his bed room door but lock it up as well from the inside where possible before going to sleep. The petitioner has strong reason to believe that his house was broken in and a highly invasive and potentially very dangerous and even lethal, diagnostic procedure was carried out on him after putting him out.

The procedure carried out on that night in February 2003 on the petitioner could not have been performed by any one other than a medical doctor and taking into account the circumstances of this particular case, the most likely scenario is that at least one medical doctor trained in anaesthesia was involved in this crime which is against all ethical norms of the medical profession and a serious offence under the various sections of the Indian penal code.

The petitioner has no idea whether there are specialist “doctors”, like the ones who administer "truth serum" or perform the so called “brain mapping” on their victims in this country and those who help in giving the lethal injections in certain "civilized" countries, appointed to the spy net works of the governments in this country to perform this sort of "operations".

The practice as the petitioner knew of it in the olden times is that after drilling a six centimeter deep hole in one's back, cotton dipped in tincture benzoin is used to seal the hole to prevent infection and stop bleeding. But then there was a possibility of the petitioner coming to know of what had happened. The philanthropic physicians of Medical College, Trivandrum and the spies probably did not want to take this risk .

It was very much possible that the petitioner could have bled to death or could have developed other fatal complications but this could easily be taken care of by producing a "relative" and paying her off. The spy's only problem is the person of the petitioner.

There is no way the petitioner can identify the spies. The petitioner till today has the bed sheet preserved as it is, without washing for the last six years, in the hope of bringing the culprits to book - it could contain tell-tale DNA evidence; but under his present circumstance there is no way he could get the necessary investigations carried out.

ii) The petitioner's hunch is that the bleeding episode was the result of a typical spy model “security” operation, carried out in a desperate attempt to substantiate the “dementia hypothesis”, in an effort to clinch the insanity plea and neutralize the petitioner.

iii) The petitioner is not aware of any provision as per the rules in vogue in this country for ordering a break in and performing a procedure on a person without his knowledge or permission in order to facilitate a policeman's collecting evidence, or as a part of treatment by a medical doctor for that matter, even if the victim happens to be a raving lunatic. There are set procedures in such cases. Even the stipulations of the mental health act with its obsession with compulsory admissions and institutional care has not been followed in this case.

iii) The callousness of the actions and the nonchalance with which the atrocities are being perpetrated makes the petitioner wonder whether it is the Indian version of the nazi gestapo, that is in action against him.

b. This petitioner has strong reason to believe that the powers that be of the medical college Thiruvananthapuram in general and the dept of physiology in particular who were hand in glove with the spies in their various nefarious activities were actively involved in this particular atrocity as well.

This petitioner firmly believes that Prof. (Dr.) Mrs. K. V. Menon , the then head of the department of physiology of medical college Trivandrum, was actively involved in the above heinous crime.

i) As one of the most enthusiastic supporters of the “dementia hypothesis” and their originators Prof. (Dr.) Mrs. K. V. Menon, never minded going out of her way to cook up evidence.

ii) This petitiioner believes that the whole operation resulting in the bleeding episode was set in motion by the spies and the intelligentsia of Thiruvananthapuram medical college to extricate Prof. (Dr.) Mrs. K. V. Menon from the mess she had landed up in.

iii) During the period immediately following on the bleeding incident, the then Head of the Department of Physiology of Medical College, Trivandrum, Prof. Dr. (Mrs.) K. Vijayalekshmi Menon, who initially had complained to the principal about the petitioner refusing to “engage” classes, had stopped allotting classes to him.

This, the petitioner feels was a sequel^xv to the happenings in his bed room on that night in February 2003.

Prof. Dr. (Mrs.) K. V. Menon, M.D., obviously was aware of the happenings and was under the impression that the petitioner has been written off.

iii) Later another professor of the same department had made an effort to help the petitioner with his MD thesis work. She was stopped in her tracks by Prof. Dr. (Mrs.) K. V. Menon probably after sharing the information gathered by the "security" operation on that night in February 2003.

c. All that the petitioner has to submit to the Hon'ble court in the above context is that, whatever results the spies and their stooges from Medical College, Trivandrum have produced in consequence of the bleeding episode of February 2003 cannot substantiate the “dementia hypothesis” in any way whatsoever. It could prove a physical illness; not a mental illness.

d. However the spy net work and their stooges from the “intelligentsia” in Thiruvananthapuram are under an illusion that by the dastardly crime described in Para 19 above and the out come there of, they have clinched the issue of the petitioners dementia and insanity and in retrospect justified all the criminal activities carried out by them in the past and they have got the license to do whatever they please with the petitioner.

The result is that the petitioner is being treated as a vegetable.

iv) One of the “bureaus” involved had decided the case extra-judicially and passed the sentence and withdrawn from the scene after handing over the petitioner to their colleagues from the other bureau and the Branch for execution; they can do whatever they please with the petitioner.

The result is that the petitioner is being treated as a vegetable.

v) The public are also welcome and can have their own share in the fun:

Some time in 2003, that was some time after the bleeding incident, the petitioner had a bunch of plainclothes men at his heels on the road in front of the university college Thiruvananthapuram, calling out “bhranthananne” (malayalam meaning “he is a mad man”).

The petitioner walked on, for any retaliation would most likely have ended him up in the nearest lunatic asylum - the mad man has become violent !

CLOUD NINE

viceMan

jyo2013wa_partOne

1. THE PERSON

1. THE PETITIONER a citizen of India by birth and domicile, was born and brought up in a middle class family in a village in the Malabar coast of peninsular India.

a. He had his early EDUCATION in the schools and colleges nearby his village.

i) He matriculated from the Madras University in the first class as the best outgoing student of Mahe de La Bourdonnais college, Mahe, South India, his Alma Mater.

2. He has a first class bachelor's degree in sciences, the only first class in life sciences from his college in his batch and
3. He was selected for studying medicine in government medical colleges in Kerala based on the marks he had scored in the above examination.

iv) All his ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS were kind courtesy his teachers in the government schools and colleges where he studied; he never had any private tuition.

b. the petitioner does not believe in preaching and is A VERY PRIVATE PERSON who strictly minds his own business.

i ) He is an unbeliever and has no god nor religious faith.

ii) He is not a member of any organization, political, religious or other wise, and has no leanings towards any groups, political parties or ideologies.

iii) A self-contained person, the petitioner was managing every thing, including the household chores, on his own without ever bothering anyone else for anything. And in spite of his poor circumstances has never incurredⁱ any debt - he had always lived within his means.

iv) He has no family, was never married, and that way, there is no one whose prospects in life are dependant on the fortunes of the petitioner.

v) The corollary is that there is no one to stand by him through thick and thin. The petitioner had faced every one of the terrible ordealsii of his eventful life all alone - he perforce had to find solace in himself.
vi) The petitioner left his ancestral home for good, way back in 1975, and ever since, has been living alone. His physical as well as mental estrangement and alienation with his relatives has been complete and irreversible.
vii) If at all any one, on the pretext of being a “relative” or “friend” of the petitioner, is taking an interest in his affairs at this stage in his life, the motives of such persons could be anything but the welfare of the petitioner.

2. An old student of Medical College, Trivandrum, the petitioner has an M.B.,B.S., degree from the Kerala University and registration with the Travancore - Cochin medical council.

a. The petitioner had a ten year stintⁱⁱ in the Indian Army as a short service commissioned officer in the Army Medical Corps.

i) His first five years in the rank of a Captain was followed by another five years in the rank of Major.

ii) Seven out of the ten years in the Indian Army was in field areas and of those seven years he had spent more than one year in high altitude areas.

iii) During the remaining three years, that is his peace posting, he was in charge of a fifteen bed section hospital of the indian army in a remote village in central India as the sole officer, medical or otherwise.

iv) While in the army he had performed his duties as a clinician as well and an officer of the Indian Army to the entire satisfaction of his superiors.

b. Upon release from the army on successful completion of the contractual period, the petitioner joined duty as a member of the teaching faculty in the medical education service of the Govt. of Kerala.

i) The petitioner had been given an appointment as Lecturer in Physiology in the Medical Education Service of the Government of Kerala in 1983 after being duly selected for the above post by the Kerala Public Service Commission and had availed joining time till his release from the army.

ii) The petitioner, a noviceⁱⁱⁱ at teaching, spent an enjoyable and most rewarding period of two years teaching medical Physiology, to the M.B.,B.S., degree students in T. D. Medical College.

iii) Edged^iv on by his apparent success as a teacher and with a view of doing better justice to his students, the petitioner took the entrance examination for post graduate courses in the medical colleges in Kerala, and based on his performance in the above examination he managed to get selection for the M.D., degree course in Physiology. The petitioner moved to govt. medical college Trivandrum as post graduate student cum lecturer in 1995.

iv) As a trainee lecturer in the Department of Physiology of medical college Trivandrum for doing his MD, the petitioner had some remarkable successes to begin with.

v) The petitioner's confidential report for the year 1995 by the head of the department of physiology of Thiruvananthapuram medical college was a flattering one. Therein the reporting officer commended the petitioner for his exemplary conduct and punctuality, praised his extraordinary proficiency in understanding new and difficult matters, his resourcefulness and originality in giving suggestions and pursuing them constructively and the petitioner's ability to get systematically to the root of the problems and for his consistently sound and well balanced judgment. Above all, the Head of the Department specifically mentioned the petitioner's keen interest in improving the standard of the practical classes.

vi) Thus the petitioner was on course for obtaining his MD degree with the Head of the Department of Physiology due to be his examiner in a couple of years' time. And an MD in medical physiology would have guaranteed him immediate promotion as assistant professor and put him in line for further promotions. However this was not to be.

vii) In the vicious atmosphere in medical college Trivandrum, within no time, everything turned topsy-turvy^v; the petitioner could never appear for the MD examination and he was still a lecturer when he retired from Kerala Government service on superannuation as mandatory at the age of 55 years on April 30, 2005.

viceMan