HOME
FRONT
8. Every
effort is being made by the stalking spies to deny the Petitioner
living space by getting him evicted from his residence whether rented
or his own and even from the hotel rooms where he used to stay while
away from home.
a. in this
context the Petitioner, would beg this Hon'ble court to permit him to
put things in the proper perspective by bringing the following to the
kind attention of the Hon'ble court.
i)
Ever since his release from the army in 1992, he has been living in
rented houses on his own, strictly minding his own business (vide
Para 1. b.)
ii)
Initially he lived in Chennai in Tamil Nadu for one year and Alleppey
in Kerala for the next two years, that is till he shifted his
residence to Thiruvananthapuram in 1995.
a)
There were no untoward incidents of any sort with anybody, let
alone the neighbours, involving the Petitioner during all those three
years while he was in Chennai or in Alleppey.
ii)
Even in Thiruvananthapuram there were no problems in the beginning
years.
a)
Initially in Thiruvananthapuram, he was staying on the first
floor of a two storey building; and a family of husband, wife and two
children were staying on the ground floor. There was not even a
proper separation of the two floors; both the floors were accessible
from within the other floor.
b)
The petitioner lived comfortably in the house without giving any
reason for any complaint whatsoever from the family. Of course they
were civilized human being.
c)
Later he shifted from that house in order to avoid the motor
cycle ride of more than nine kilometers to his workplace and back in
the dicey national high way traffic.
d)
Even long after he left the house the couple proved to be of big
help to the petitioner like when he was trying to claim the advance
increment for his army service - both of them were on the staff of
the accountant general Kerala.
iii)
The petitioner's problems started, as usual, once the secret police
took over “charge” of his affairs in their hands ( vide Para 4.
a. i) ).
i) It
was following the Petitioner's complaint to the NHRC about police
harassment in 2001 that the spies started sending their hired thugs
to the Petitioner's residence to terrorise him in an effort to make
him submit to their dictates. From then on in almost every rented
house the Petitioner had stayed in Thiruvananthapuram the spies had
their hired thugs breaking in, abusing and insulting him for no rhyme
or reason.
ii) In
the year 2004 this petitioner made a writ application in
the Kerala high court alleging police harassment. The
hon'ble court decided that no orders were required as the
govt pleader had assured the court there was no question of
harassment.
{
And
rightly so, for if I was being harassed the govt pleader would have
told the court “ yes, we are harassing him”.
Incidentally
the case came up for hearing during the time immediately after the
bleeding episode in 2003 (vide chapter 6.). }
ii) Could
be that the above decision by the Kerala high court came as
a shot in the arm for the spies for they became bolder and
the goons instead of carrying out their “duty”
standing outside started gatecrashing into his residence
and delivering him death threats.
c.
During the period from march 2003 to march 2006 the Petitioner
was putting up in house no.403, Bapuji Nagar, Thiruvananthapuram-XI,
PIN-695011. On the night of February 14, 2006, one of the residents
of a neighbouring house, along with an accomplice, broke into the
Petitioner's rented house at around 2100hrs, threatened the
Petitioner and showered vulgar abuses on him. A fist fight was
avoided by the Petitioner keeping his cool and refusing to respond to
the taunts of the assailant and his threats of physical violence.
i) After about
half an hour of shouting abuses and threats failed to evoke any
response from the Petitioner, the assailants walked away threatening
to beat the Petitioner to death. A voice record of the assailant is
available with the petitioner.
ii)
The Petitioner is just aware that the assailant is the resident of
house No. BN 400, Bapuji Nagar, Thiruvananthapuram PIN 695011, the
second house on the opposite side of the road in front of BN403,
the Petitioner's then residence. The Petitioner never had any
dealings of any sort, verbal or otherwise, with this assailant prior
to the above incident. In fact, the first ever interaction between
the Petitioner and this “neighbour” of his for almost three
years, was on that fateful night.
iii)
There was no reason whatsoever for the above assailant, who is a
perfect stranger as far as the Petitioner is concerned, to take
umbrage on the Petitioner, except, perhaps, in case he is a member
of the spy networks himself; nor would he have dared to commit such
a crime but for the peculiar circumstances of the Petitioner's
existence.
iv)
The Petitioner has firm reason to believe that the above assailant
was acting on behalf of and on specific instructions from a senior
member of the spy net work of the government who was parking himself
in the above assailant's house, No.BN400, during the nights, where
the “officer” probably was being dined, wined and entertained
and was directing the nefarious activities targeted at his innocent
victim from there.
{
It could also be that these
assailants are regular members or hired agents of the spy net works
of the government like the IB. when I met a lawyer with the compact
disk containing the threat and a photograph of this character he said
nothing can be done about it. And by the time I came out of the
lawyer's house there was a police jeep parked close by with a
plainclothes man caressing the bonnet. }
v)
On an earlier occasion on the night of 16/17 may 2005 at 0300hrs two
men claiming to be policemen from the Thiruvananthapuram medical
college police station had knocked at the gate of the Petitioner and
had an argument with him. Half way through the incident, the
policemen went back towards the house BN 400 and talked to some one
there.
vi)
This Petitioner believes that the policemen where taking orders from
a senior member of the spy net work of the government who, as
mentioned in the previous paragraph was operating from the above
house.
vii)
The men then came back, abused the Petitioner, presumably on the
orders of the spy staying in BN. 400 and went off.
d.
Another similar instance was in 2009 where the culprit was Mr.
N.Dineshan of narayana bhavan, mannamoola, perurkada,
Thiruvananthapuram – 695005, The Petitioner has a voice record of
the assailant made from within the Petitioner's premises available
with him /which is produced herewith on a Compact Disk and marked
EXHIBIT P9. This time the Petitioner resort to legal action. The
documents in this regard are produce here with and marked ANNEXURE
P0
i) This time this Petitioner lodged a complaint with the local
police which proved to be counterproductive.
ii) The culprit was let off by the concerned sub-inspector of police
as per directions from a senior policeman received on his cell phone
telephone in the presence of the Petitioner.
iii)
No case was registered.
iv)
The sub inspector, towards the end of the convsersation had asked
the “Sir” “what is to be done to jyothi” and this was
followed by an effort on the part of the sub- inspector of police to
bully this complainant which was nipped in the bud by the
Petitioner.
v)
The Petitioner then approached the Hon'ble Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram with a complaint under section 190 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 copy of which produced herewith
and marked ANNEXURE P0 .
The
Hon'ble CJM also made it clear that he did not want to proceed with
the complaint and directed the Petitioner to withdraw the complaint.
e.
The fact that the Petitioner does not own a house became his
Achilles' heel.
i)
The gentlemen who had given the house on rental for a minimum period
of one year were having a change of mind within a couple of months
of doing so and wanted the house back on one pretext or other.
ii)
The fact was that the house owners were being made to evict the
Petitioner by the spies as another of the harassment tactics.
iii)
In the year 2009 – 10 the Petitioner was made to shift thrice
from one rented house to another during a period of 15 months. Every
such move involved finding a new house for rental, packing up things
transporting them to the new locale, unpacking and arranging the
things in the new place and all this was being done by a one man
army.
f.
It was under the above circumstances that the
Petitioner while already into his sixties started thinking on the
line of constructing a small house for himself. But the spy had
decided that the Petitioner does not require a house – they were
making other arrangements for the Petitioner. And all his efforts at
getting a house constructed are being torpedoed by the spies vide
infra.
i)
The Petitioner had a difficult time finding a place thanks to the
stalking members of the spy net work and their hired agents. However
he ultimately managed to procure a plot of land at his present
address.
ii)
And in deed, the construction work started in right earnest in august
2011 for of a small single storey < 80 sq. meter house using the
low cost building techniques of the famous Dr. Laury Baker at a
total estimated cost of 9 lakhs just adjacent to the shack.
iii)
However, in June 2012 things came to a grinding halt, with the
builders engaged by the Petitioner in a sudden turn around refusing
to proceed further after constructing the basement part.
a)
Interestingly there was no reason given for this sudden change of
mind; the builder simply was “no more interested”.
{
you do whatever you want with
jyothi; “WE” , the members of the secret police will take care of
the resultant mess.
Unfortunately
many a time the culprits ultimately will have to fend for themselves
and then they get angry with jyothi!
You
cannot afford to take umbrage with the secret police. }
iv)
The option of going to another builder is not a viable proposition
as far as the Petitioner is concerned for due to the unique
construction methodology adopted by the original builders if the
Petitioner goes to a normal builder he will have to start from
scratch and that will result in tremendous monetary loss to the
Petitioner over and above the loss of time.
iv)
The Petitioner filed a complaint with the District Consumer
Disputes Redressal Forum of Thiruvananthapuram.
a)
The opposite party initially was using delaying tactics, getting the
matter postponed time and again.
b)
This Petitioner believes was in the hope that the promise of the spy
that they will be neutralizing the complainant within no time and at
the next hearing he wont be represented and the case can be closed.
c)
However the spies' boasts did not materialise and the opposite party
was in an embarrassing situation with not even a semblance of an
excuse for the breach of trust.
d)
The current situation is that the opposite party has started
resorting to mud-slinging in a desperate attempt to give a semblance
of decency to their actions. That way another group has jumped on the
bandwagon of the spies ( vide Para No. 7. c. iii) ).
v)
The petitioners chances of shifting from the shack to a proper house
is getting bleaker and bleaker day by day.
g.
This Petitioner who had moved into the shack in June 2011 in the
hope that it is going to be for a few months only as specified by
the builder till the house proper is constructed, finds himself
literally trapped with the litigation dragging on.
i)
His shack initially had just a single room 4 x 3 sq. meters and he
shifted into it for a couple of reasons:
a)
it will save him the house rent, that is if at all he could hoodwink
the spies and get one, which as far as the petitioner is concerned is
a tremendous plus point in view of his financial status.
b)
the shack was on the very same plot where he was constructing his
house and it was going to be convenient for him to be available on
the spot.
c)
The very crude behaviour of some of the staff of the hotels he was
putting up in Thiruvananthapuram in those days.
{ Gradually
over the years I have improvised a lot and things here have also
improved a lot.
The
diamensions of the structure have gone up to 5 x 4 sq meters with an
ante-room added.
My
vehicles are no more exposed to the ravages of the tropical weather
thanks to the small shelter I have conceived and got erected for a
piddly sum at just 50% of what the contractors were demanding.
The
voltage of the electric supply has shot up from the 70 to 135 volts
of the yonder years to a steady <230 volts ! My home appliances
like fridge, water pump, washing machine are working fine.
I
have running water thanks to the tube-well I have dug; and running
hot water is a recent addition.
The
nearby road is motorable, a far cry from the thing that existed two
year back.
Of
course it is a bit congested; but may be I have become used to the
situation.
Simply
put, I have made myself as comfortable as possible. That does not
suit the spy - I have to be unsettled at the earliest. }
iii)
Now that the petitioner is living in his own accommodation,
though it is a shack only, there is no question of the spy getting
him thrown out by the landlord.
But
the spy has not given up and is still very much at it.
a)
The latest is that the the labile women folk of the locality has
been roped in under the aegis of the local body in an effort to get
him evicted from his residence on one pretext or other (cf. Para 8.
a. ).
{ it
is a no holds barred situation and I will not be surprised if
tomorrow I am being prosecuted for “yon shoshan”.
Incidentally
in every house break by the spies agents – the spy plans the break
in at nights only for strategic reasons; and even at those hours -
they were accompanied by their female consorts !
-
the spy is a ladies' man }
